One Australian business has actually prevented staff from using the technology, others are scrambling for recommendations on its cybersecurity implications - while federal government ministers are prompting care.

But others have welcomed DeepSeek's arrival, requiring Australia to follow China's lead in developing effective yet less energy-intensive AI technology.

In the days because the Chinese business introduced its R1 synthetic intelligence design and publicly launched its chatbot and app, it has upended the AI market.

- Register for Guardian Australia's breaking news email

Several worldwide industry leaders saw their market price drop after the launch, as DeepSeek revealed AI could be established using a fraction of the cost and processing required to train models such as ChatGPT or Meta's Llama.

Its arrival may signify a brand-new industry shift, but for government and company, the result is unclear. Whereas ChatGPT's 2022 arrival captured federal governments and organizations by surprise as staff began to try out the brand-new AI innovation, at least for the arrival of Deepseek, grandtribunal.org some had a playbook.

Business as normal

A spokesperson for Telstra stated the business had "a strenuous procedure to evaluate all AI tools, abilities, and utilize cases in our business", a list of authorized generative AI tools, utahsyardsale.com and guidelines on how to use them.

In the meantime at Telstra, menwiki.men DeepSeek is not authorized and its use is not encouraged (although it's not formally blocked).

"Our preferred partner is MS Copilot, and we're presenting 21,000 Copilot for Microsoft 365 licences to our staff members."

Other companies sought instant advice on whether DeepSeek should be adopted.

Major Australian cybersecurity company CyberCX's executive director of cyber intelligence, Katherine Mansted, said clients had actually already approached the company for recommendations on whether the technology was safe.

"That's no surprise, since it seems the entire world has actually remained in a little a DeepSeek frenzy - both the economically and market inclined and those with the security lens," Mansted said.

DeepSeek and government

CyberCX today took the unusual action of rapidly providing recommendations advising organisations, including government departments and those keeping sensitive information, highly think about limiting access to DeepSeek on work devices.

"We know that there is no proactive policy here from government ... We've been down this road before," Mansted said. "We've had debates about TikTok, about Chinese surveillance electronic cameras, about Huawei in the telco network, and we always act after the fact, not before the fact ... Here, especially because the hazards are around compromise of delicate info, in regards to any info that you put into this AI assistant: it's going directly to China.

"We thought we required to act much faster this time."

Under federal AI policy executed in September 2024, agencies have till completion of February 2025 to publish openness files about their usage of AI.

But understanding who makes choices on the specific use of DeepSeek in the federal government has actually shown difficult. The chief law officer's department, that made the choice to ban TikTok use on federal government devices, referred questions to the Digital Transformation Agency, which in turn referred enquires to the Department of Home Affairs.

Home Affairs was asked on Thursday for its main policy and did not offer an action by the time of publication.

Familiar disputes ...

A few of the response in Australia to DeepSeek is by now familiar. There have actually been calls to ban the innovation, amidst concern over how the Chinese government might access user information - an echo of the days Huawei was prohibited from the NBN and 5G rollouts in Australia, and more just recently, of the argument over prohibiting TikTok.

The Australian Strategic Policy Institute, a strong critic of the China federal government, stated today that Australia "can not continue the existing technique of reacting to each new tech advancement". It called for a tech strategy covering AI that included investing in sovereign AI abilities.

The industry minister, Ed Husic, said on Tuesday it was too early to make a decision on whether DeepSeek was a security risk.

Sign up to Breaking News Australia

Get the most important news as it breaks

"If there is anything that presents a risk in the nationwide interest, we will always keep an open mind and see what happens. I think it's too early to leap to conclusions on that," he stated. "But, again, if we need to act, experienciacortazar.com.ar then accountable federal governments do."

He worried that Australia is "in the final stages" of preparing its reaction and would develop its own regulatory settings.

"The US is flagging their approach. The EU has theirs. Canada likewise will have a different method. And our regional partners also are taking a look at this," he said.